Court Decisions and Links

AWA Federal Court Lawsuits

USCIS AWA Federal Court Cases

 

Hadees v. Johnson, No. 5:15-CV-1087., Dist. Court, ND New York, September 23, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Swensen v. Lynch, 1:15-cv-02642, Colorado District Court, September 19, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Bremer v. Johnson, No. 15-1163. , Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, August 25, 2016

Conclusion: Court reverses the district court’s dismissal of Count II, affirm dismissal of the remaining counts, and remand for further proceedings.

.

Santos v. Klapakis, Civil No. 3:16-cv-00465., Dist. Court, MD Pennsylvania, August 3, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants defendants’ motion to transfer case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

.

Solorio v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-01123-DAD-EPG., Dist. Court, ED California, July 8, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Bakran v. Johnson, Civil Action No. 15-127., Dist. Court, ED Pennsylvania, June 28, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Parella v. Johnson, No. 1:15-cv-0863 (LEK/DJS)., Dist. Court, ND New York, June 27, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Pearson v. Rodriguez, Civil Case No. 15-00617 (TFH)., Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia, March 31, 2016 Copy of complaint here

Conclusion: Court transfers case to the Eastern District of Virginia.

.

Makransky v. Johnson, No. 15-CV-1259(JS)., Dist. Court, ED New York, March 29, 2016.

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Struniak v. Lynch, Case No. 1:15-cv-1447., Dist. Court, ED Virginia, January 29, 2016

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Reynolds v. Johnson, No. 12-55675., Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, December 31, 2015.

Conclusion: Affirmed in part and Vacated and Remanded in part.

.

Suhail v. US Attorney General, Case No. 15-cv-12595., Dist. Court, ED Michigan, November 12, 2015

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Chan v. USCIS, Docket No. 1:14-cv-00289-MOC-DLH, Dist. Court, WD North Carolina, October 23, 2015

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Burbank v. Johnson, No. 2:14-CV-292-RMP., Dist. Court, ED Washington, July 29, 2015

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Walker v. Lynch, 2:15-cv-00062., Kentucky Eastern District Court, July 10, 2015

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Bittinger v. Johnson, No. 1:14-cv-1560., Dist. Court, MD Pennsylvania, June 22, 2015

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Bremer v. Johnson, Case No. 13-1226-CV-W-ODS., Dist. Court, WD Missouri, June 22, 2015

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Naik v. DIRECTOR USCIS VERMONT, No. 13-3253., Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, August 13, 2014

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Bains v. US, Case No. 1:13CV1014., Dist. Court, ND Ohio, July 9, 2014.

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Naik v. Renaud, Civil Action No. 12-cv-4057 (JAP)., 947 F. Supp. 2d 464 – Dist. Court, D. New Jersey, May 22, 2013

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Sutton v. Napolitano, No. 13-cv-173-wmc., 986 F. Supp. 2d 948 – Dist. Court, WD Wisconsin, November 15, 2013

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

.

Beeman v. Napolitano, Civil No. 10-803-JO., Dist. Court, D. Oregon, May 17, 2011

Conclusion: Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.

 .


Here is a story that shows how the US government has decided to start punishing people for the crimes that others have committed. Crazy? Can’t happen? Read on.

https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/insidenews/archive/2014/05/29/the-bia-39-s-adam-walsh-act-trilogy-because-we-can.aspx?Redirected=true

 


3 Comments:

  1. A link from the Huffington Post, showing yet more reasons why the IML should be removed from law.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamara-rice-lave/international-megans-law-_b_9513242.html

  2. Pardon my ignorance, but with the cases about that read, “Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint.” Does this mean the State won or the petitioner? If it is the case that the state won are there any cases that are available to read that the petitioner won? Thanks in advance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *